RCEP sends a signal on global trade
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement has finally been signed, almost a decade after it was first conceived at The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in Bali in 2011.
Any economic benefit from the unprecedented agreement will not occur immediately. It is expected to take effect within two years, after it has been ratified by the member countries. But the strong signal it sends about the region’s commitment to integration cannot be under-estimated, especially given recent concerns about de-globalisation.
With the removal of trade barriers in the region and greater harmonisation, economic integration between ASEAN and China, Japan and South Korea will be greatly enhanced. Supply chain shifts already underway in the region will accelerate.
Negotiations for the RCEP began in May 2013, and lasted 31 rounds. The agreement involves the 10 ASEAN members together with China, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. These 15 countries account for around 30 per cent of global GDP, 30 per cent of the world’s population, and 27 per cent of global trade.
What is notable is this is the first multilateral free-trade agreement China is a part of. India, which participated in the earlier negotiations, opted out of the RCEP in November 2019. However, the door remains open for India to join in future.
The principal aim of the RCEP is to bridge two existing and longstanding proposals by adopting an open ascension scheme: the East Asia Free Trade Agreement, which focuses on ASEAN plus China, Japan and South Korea; and the Comprehensive Economic Partnership which added three economies, Australia, New Zealand and India to ASEAN.
The RCEP is less ambitious in terms of trade issues covered and utilises a clear step-by-step approach, compared to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
One key difference between the RCEP and the CPTPP is that while the RCEP covers standard items such as trade in goods and services, investments and dispute settlements, it does not extend to more onerous areas such as the environment and labour and food safety standards.
But one of the benefits that RCEP will bring is to harmonise tariff schedules and rules of origin, helping streamline the various existing and overlapping ASEAN FTA rules (commonly known as the ‘noodle bowl’ effect).
Furthermore, unlike the CPTPP, which applies the same standards across all countries, RCEP recognises the individual and diverse levels of development and economic needs of members. The agreement has provisions for special and differential treatment for the CLMV economies (Cambodia, Laos PDR, Myanmar and Vietnam).
The Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates the RCEP will add $US186 billion to the global economy by 2030. They estimate that most of the gains will go to China ($US85 billion), Japan ($US48 billion) and South Korea ($US23 billion).
Within ASEAN, the biggest beneficiaries will be Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia. The estimated benefits may not seem large for some ASEAN countries, but it still has the effect of expanding the economic pie in the region. If India were to join the RCEP, the additional gain to the global economy is estimated at $US53 billion.
For Australia and New Zealand, the immediate benefits from RCEP will not be large, estimated at $US1 billion each. This is because both countries already have existing FTAs with China and ASEAN. But there is a longer term benefit from greater integration with Asia, which is expected to post much stronger economic growth compared to Europe or the US.
In addition, Australia and New Zealand stand to gain from being on the ground floor as the Mekong economies develop faster under the RCEP, as they stand to benefit from differentiated treatment and technical assistance.
Separately, China, Japan and South Korea have also been negotiating their own free trade deal. This could now get a renewed push with the RCEP agreement signed, further paving the way for more trade and investment flow in the region.
The focus will now turn to how US President-elect Biden will seek to engage in the region with regards to trade when he is sworn in.
The US is not part of the two large trade deals in the region – the RCEP and CPTPP. Having the US as part of either trade agreement will greatly enhance the benefits and provide a boost to longer term growth prospects for the region.
Khoon Goh is Head of Asia Research at ANZ
This story is an edited version of an ANZ Research report. You can read the original report HERE.
This publication is published by Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ABN 11 005 357 522 (“ANZBGL”) in Australia. This publication is intended as thought-leadership material. It is not published with the intention of providing any direct or indirect recommendations relating to any financial product, asset class or trading strategy. The information in this publication is not intended to influence any person to make a decision in relation to a financial product or class of financial products. It is general in nature and does not take account of the circumstances of any individual or class of individuals. Nothing in this publication constitutes a recommendation, solicitation or offer by ANZBGL or its branches or subsidiaries (collectively “ANZ”) to you to acquire a product or service, or an offer by ANZ to provide you with other products or services. All information contained in this publication is based on information available at the time of publication. While this publication has been prepared in good faith, no representation, warranty, assurance or undertaking is or will be made, and no responsibility or liability is or will be accepted by ANZ in relation to the accuracy or completeness of this publication or the use of information contained in this publication. ANZ does not provide any financial, investment, legal or taxation advice in connection with this publication.